Peter and all,
My vote is below. Question 2 below seems to have multiple
different possible understanding. I suggest that it be
re-written to clarify its intent. See my comments following it.
1. That the fee for individual members be $US100 from 2005 onwards.
____ Affirmative (comments optional)
____ Negative (no comment)
_X__ Negative (with comments...)
____ Abstain
Comments:
See Wolfgang's comments. I agree with his perspective.
2. That:
- DASC entity membership be extended to IEEE-SA Corporate members, and
- entities be allowed DASC membership at the same fee structure used
for IEEE-SA corporate membership and with a number of DASC individual
memberships equal to the number of SA individual memberships granted
to SA corporate members
(see http://standards.ieee.org/sa-mem/corporate.html), and
- the DASC request IEEE-SA to mutually extend membership to DASC entity
members.
____ Affirmative (comments optional)
____ Negative (no comment)
__X__ Negative (with comments...)
____ Abstain
Comments:
????
The last sentence of the proposed question confuses me. When you
mutually extend membership, it seems to saying that:
If you join IEEE-SA as a corporate member, then you are automatically
a DASC corporate member.
If you join DASC as a corporate member, they you are automatically
an IEEE-SA corporate member.
DASC has little choice about corporate based membership. Since
there are corporate based standards groups, either the DASC must
have corporate based support/membership for these groups or
it must drop its interest in being part of the governing of
these groups.
I need some clairification about the question. What I
would like it to be conveying is:
DASC entity membership fee is set to be the same as the IEEE-SA
membership fee as specified at:
http://standards.ieee.org/sa-mem/corporate.html
(hence to be a corporate member of IEEE-SA and DASC then the
total fee to a company is 2X the IEEE-SA fee).
To be a voting member of a DASC sponsored/co-sponsored corporate
based standards group, a company must be a DASC corporate member.
Please clarify the question as if it is the later, then I will change
my vote to affirmative.
Best regards,
Jim Lewis
Received on Sun Nov 14 15:20:13 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Nov 14 2004 - 15:20:36 PST