Re: Review of DASC membership fees

> Since there's a tendency misinterpret and I wasn't as clear as I
> should've been:
>
> > Only 3 WGs for which DASC membership provides value:
> > All entity-based WG P&Ps are to be reviewed for the
> > purpose of requiring individual participants to be
> > DASC members. This would provide the desired
> > orthogonality between entity and individual memberships.
>
> That is, to the extent that an entity-based WG allows individuals to
> vote on issues at the WG sub-group (committee/task force) level, DASC
> membership would be required of those individuals. This is consistent
> with IEEE, SA and DASC policy that anyone can participate, only voting
> privileges are reserved for members.
>
> -Steve Bailey
>

Steve,

After correcting your statement to say "DASC or SA membership would be
required" it will become more clear DASC would provide value for 3 WGs
only.

Regards,

Alec
Received on Mon Nov 15 16:11:06 2004