Steve: I trust that you did not have the intention to give such implicit message. After all you were compaining in plain English. Hwever the offenssive addition remains offensive and it should be avoided. What can we do to check out the system? Should we report this to the system administrator in charge of the DASC reflector servers? Just "dropping this from further discussion," looks to me like discovering a bug and neglecting it. Kind regards, Alex Zamfirescu On 2/14/08, Bailey, Stephen <SBailey@model.com> wrote: > > I am replying personally and not as a member of the Appeals Committee as > the referenced email was generated by me and because the referenced email > is from an independent discussion thread and is not relevant to the election > issues raised by Alex. > > Second, I did NOT enter the "{SPAM?}" text into the subject line. An > email client or server did that completely outside of my control. As proof, > I attach the original email as I sent it as I had saved a copy. It clearly > shows that, as sent by me, the quoted text was not present in the subject > line. I also have the copy that Alex referenced from the hypermail archive > of the reflector that does have the text. > > I'm sorry Alex took offense to the added text. However, the offensive > action was not taken by me, nor any other human (the DASC reflector is > unmoderated). > > Now that the record has been cleared and put straight, I hope we can drop > this issue from further discussion. > > -Steve Bailey > > > > > -- > Alex Zamfirescu > 650-814-7514 > alex.zamfirescu@gmail.com > http://alex.zamfirescu.googlepages.com > ========= > This communication, and its attachments, may contain > privileged, or confidential information, intended for a specific > individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the > intended recipient, you should delete this communication, and/or > shred the materials and any attachments, and are hereby notified that > any disclosure, copying or distribution of this communication, or > the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. > Interception of e-mail is a crime under the Electronic Communication > Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521 and 2701-2709. If you have > received this transmission in error, please notify me by reply > e-mail at alex.zamfirescu@gmail.com and destroy the original transmission > and its attachments without reading them, or saving them to disk. > Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. > ========= > > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Thu Feb 14 18:42:07 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Feb 14 2008 - 18:42:26 PST